Something wicked this way comes.
With Dan Giese now headed to the DL, the Yankees are suddenly in need of a 4th starter.
Rumblings have grown into whispers, and whispers (I fear) will soon turn to chilled cries of horror.
Carl Pavano may be ready to return to The Bronx.
If this misfortune is due to befall us, it is understandable. The Connecticut Kid's contract is coming off of the books and the Yankees might certainly want to squeeze some "production" out of their prized, walking infirmary. What's more, when your other pitching option is Phil Hughes, the (former?) crown jewel of prospects, it seems logical that Pavano becomes the guy you rush. What does Brian Cashman care if Pavano is not quite "there"? Get on the mound, dipshit.
So, on the ever-more-realistic chance that Carl makes it back to the Bigs (without incident), here are the possible outcomes, as I see them.
Please choose one of the following:
A) Carl Pavano returns and is abysmal; the Yankees miss the playoffs, and Carl rides, ever-so-quietly, into the sunset, never to be heard from again.
B) Carl Pavano returns and is astoundingly good; the Yankees ride to a world championship on Carl's fragile back; Carl is rewarded by Brian Cashman (whose job has been saved) with a new contract and his career is reborn.
C) Carl Pavano returns and removes himself from his first start in the 3rd inning, citing an unspecified "soreness" that no medical test can confirm or locate; Carl is never heard from again.
D) Car Pavano returns and pitches with a Darrell Rasner-esque mediocrity; the Yankees miss the playoffs, but Carl's performance is just passable enough to warrant a $1 million, incentive-laden, 1-year contract from...let's say...the St. Louis Cardinals.
Personally, I'll vote "D," not only because it's baseball economics at its finest, but because Pavano's stealing money from the Yankees for four years and then parlaying that theft into yet another contract feels like the appropriate way for this whole disaster to end.
Thoughts? Alternative (more infuriating) scenarios?
_
Thursday, August 14, 2008
He Who Must Not Be Named
Labels:
Brian Cashman,
Carl Pavano,
contract,
Dan Giese,
Darrell Rasner,
injury,
mediocrity,
payroll
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It's "E" - none of the above. The real answer is a combination of C & D. Carl goes three, leaves because he "has an ouchie on his bottom" and somehow still finagles a 1 year contract from...say...the Chicago White Sox - where he impossibly becomes lights out for one year. Wait - that was Contreras, right?
Post a Comment